« MT-Textile | Main | End of Iraq war, where's WMD? »

May 06, 2003

It's all about abstraction

We have the programming language evolution starting with machine code, then assembly language to C, Pascal, Fortran; from there it keep going to C++/Java/Smalltalk/C#, VB/Delphi, and the alternative like function language gone along the parallel path. All it shows was a path to have higher and higher layer of abstraction, which help human being’s brain to perceive a more structural modeling. It works, in terms of better understanding or implementation.

So it’s all about abstraction. CSS is an abstraction. While people being tired of spaghetti markup codes, CSS was brought into the picture. It’s intuitive. These people, who design webpages, code it, understand and reading the markup tags, need a better way to think abstractly. CSS just make life easier, you could have think ahead to draft a better model of the design, better control of the style, reusable elements…

I used to be late on what’s the happening topics. I was just aware of the recent arguing of to CSS or not to CSS, which started from JWZ on his CSS is BS . Lots of people argued over what traditional presentation tags could do (especially table layout design) and CSS can’t. CSS do have the drawback because of different browsers’ implementation and bugs, so you’d be easily to be depressed while you want to get the required layout by CSS. I ain’t a web designer sleep with HTML/CSS everyday. I started learning CSS a few months back and do experience the same frustration with layout design, why_it_work_here_not_working_there browsers problem. But I’d still stand on CSS side. Why? Because it’s a better way to design. We’re not talking about one or two page design but a whole website, where you got to wondering about the consitency across all the pages, architecture, process flow. CSS provides big help because it’s one step further, it’s an abstraction of web design.

CSS can’t be a silver bullet though. It did facing the problems that:

  1. unconsistency of browser implementation, lot of bugs waiting to be catched up
  2. hard to learn. CSS is difficult? No, not the basic CSS at least. You could easily learn about basic rules of CSS in 10 minutes, then you got all your H1, H2, H3, p tags having the same font family. But when it come to more advanced level, where you have to cope with layout/positioning and even tricks to hide certain CSS from certain browsers, that’s pretty hard part.

Hard to learn shouldn’t be an excuse to web designers. However, the world of web/HTML isn’t only involved with professional web designers. We have application programmers or even DB administrators have to deal with HTML occasionally. We have ordinary people wanted to have their own web publishing. There are tools (e.g. Blogging tools, CMS) to help on web publishing, but ain’t force/help on CSS usage. In all these cases, cope with standard implementation and various bugs or tricks is just too annoying and people tend to give it up, back to easier table layout design. And that bring more satisfaction because you get exactly what you want! Technique to do proper presentation layout like table would live long since whatever works would stay.

Come on guys, why so picky on table vs CSS? Just use table at appropriate place (e.g. simple tabular data), use CSS for the overall design and control.

I find no perfect solution though. CSS is still the direction. Everybody could have their own choice, but please stick to it since you’d benefit in the long run. Maybe we shouldn’t be rush, at the end of day, CSS doesn’t look so hard at all, as long as you don’t learn all the dark side of browsers in one single day.

Further reading:

May 6, 2003 05:17 PM | MovableType & Blogging
[ Trackback URL for this entry: http://www.yowkee.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/49 ]
Comments/Trackback

Link: Yowkee Essential: It's all about abstraction Wow, check it out, because of my brief rant about CSS yesterday I'm last on Yowkee's "Further Reading" list. If only I'd known . . . Id've REALLY gone off as to the...

06:14 AM on May 7, 2003 · Trackback from Kris Bell Blogs · #

Related entries in yowkee essential
Related blogs from Waypath
Waypath
[mezzoblue dailies] - Sunday, September 14, 2003
Point : there are people who will steal Zen Garden designs no matter what we do. ... Point : those who need to use other people s CSS are still learning, or they re lazy. ... If it s the former, their use is an intermediate step; when they feel comfortable enough to move beyond someone else s design, there s no question they will. ... If it s the latter, the site they re applying the design to won t be around for long anyway. ... I realized the value of the Zen Garden is much more than I originally intended: not only do we have a strong ...
[Stopdesign] - Thursday, August 28, 2003
Monday | 25 August 2003 Weaving CSS Dreams In promising news for web design and development, Macromedia s Dreamweaver MX 2004 claims it will possess much more powerful CSS support, as well as significant improvements which will help its users create accessible content. ... Susan Morrow, a senior director for Macromedia, is quoted with this statement in an article at MacCentral : s time for CSS to become the broad standard it should be, [ ] However, to date, it s been difficult to implement. ... When the s New list starts with Rich CSS ...
[Stopdesign] - Thursday, August 28, 2003
Tuesday | 26 August 2003 On Standards and Semantics Jason Kottke wrote a post tonight about the general confusion surrounding web standards, semantically rich markup, and the relationship between the two. ... However, it s a fairly natural tendency for someone to discover what it means to use more meaningful markup as it gets stripped down to the basics. ... If I m right, then there s no reason why tools like Dreamweaver, (in a generation or two s time), can t construct documents in a satisfactorary and compliant fashion for the majority of ...