« A standards compliant web publishing tool | Main | weblogs.com ping »

June 07, 2003

Jeremy's rant of font on Linux

Jeremy was frustrated with font on Linux, he has tried to do a simple task to have a decent view on 3 different browsers (of course, all running under Linux): Mozilla Firebird, Mozilla, Konqueror. Well, page on Firebird and Konqueror look crappy, Mozilla get the smooth-edged font right. Mozilla and Konqueror appeared to have the same fonts chosen but showing different result. Mozilla Firebird is still displaying the original font name for users to choose, something like *-adobe-*-time… (yes, that’s pain in the ass when you need to figure out what it is).

I don’t really know what’s the cause, but I do know how it feel. Back to the days where I had to configure my own Linux environment, I got to spent over 10 hours in front of the monitor, just to make the window look good. Certainly techniques to using TrueType font and XFT have been existed for a long time, and I am sure most of the Linux distribution put them on by default. So you ain’t gonna face this problem if you just install some distribution and using it with default option. The pain would come when you want to tune something. Is Linux ready for Desktop? To certain extend, I think the answer is yes. It got the environment for you to get the jobs done, it got the beautiful window manager which fairly perform most of UI job. However, if you tried to customize/configure something or you’re having some not-so-supported hardwares, Linux isn’t quite friendly to most of the users. Unless you got the know how, you won’t be out of the mess.

In my opinion, X Windows is the single biggest burden for Linux to be the desktop to compete other modern system. Lots of known techniques and solutions to well-known problems aren’t quite being aware. Linux kernel, filesystems are stable and reliable, lots of open source tools greatly improve productivity, but on UI side like font or printing issues are quite competitive to their rivals. These problems got existed solutions, but why people would still be bothered? Is it too many choices where different techniques applied by different distributions? Or the know-how is too difficult to access?

I’ve been using WinXP for the font. Maybe it’s time to try the latest Redhat 9 to check how’s the current Linux distribution answers to the desktop requirement. For sure we’d need trivial issues like font and printing to be working at the first place, then we’d talk about Linux for the desktop computing environment.

June 7, 2003 04:41 AM | Computing
[ Trackback URL for this entry: http://www.yowkee.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/95 ]
Comments/Trackback
Related entries in yowkee essential
Related blogs from Waypath
Waypath
[Justin @ LiveJournal] - Monday, August 25, 2003
I???ve decided the only bad thing about Linux is the display issues.... not that it looks bad (it looks awesome), but trying to make fonts the same size and density (boldness/lightness/etc) as Windows is a BITCH. ... Yes, it supports TrueType (TTF) fonts, just like Windows, but it renders them differently: much better, actually, but at much finer resolutions, so I find myself sitting 3 inches from the screen to read them. ... The real problem here is I???m used to Windows displaying things incorrectly, because it doesn???t really tune your ...
[Five Acres with a View] - Wednesday, September 24, 2003
Missing True Type If you notice a slight difference here, it is because I decided to change my default serif font in the CSS to Times Roman because the existing choices sucked when I looked at my weblog using Mozilla under LInux. ... How odd that True Type fonts, the thing I liked most about Windows 3.1, is the thing I miss the most under Linux. ... Otherwise I don't miss much, though it would be nice to get my Palm synchronizing with Linux, and to be able to use the scanner. ... Linux obstinately refuses to see anything as a scanner but a ...
[Andy Social's Home of Joy and Light] - Saturday, September 27, 2003
Politics Monday - One should never discuss politics or religion unless prepared to have a battle of wills. ... I am still amazed, after so long using Linux and Windows (as well as Solaris and Xenix) that the two sides are so entrenched that they can't even have a rational discussion. ... The Linux fanatics (not users, just the fanatical ones) automatically associate anyone who doesn't call Windows Windoze or Windoofs with the evil empire. ... Meanwhile, the Windows fanatics (same disclaimer) portray all Linux users as programming geeks, ...